The ruling was the second time in a year that a federal court had found that Google had acted illegally to maintain its dominance. The judge ruled the company was a monopolist in two out of three sets of ad products.
Lees verder op New York Times
The ruling was the second time in a year that a federal court had found that Google had acted illegally to maintain its dominance. The judge ruled the company was a monopolist in two out of three sets of ad products.
Lees verder op New York Times